Brightman v. InMode Ltd et al
Plaintiff: DR Lori Brightman and Dr. Lori A. Brightman
Defendant: InMode Ltd
Case Number: 7:2022cv05861
Filed: July 8, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Cathy Seibel
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons served on InMode Ltd. on August 16, 2022. Document filed by Lori A. Brightman..(Reitzas, Joshua)
August 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Motion for Joseph P. Garin to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (JR)
August 5, 2022 Opinion or Order >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #5 MOTION for Joseph P. Garin to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-26505104. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (sgz)
August 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION for Joseph P. Garin to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-26505104. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Lori A. Brightman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C).(Garin, Joseph)
July 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to InMode Ltd. (vf)
July 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Reitzas, Joshua)
July 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to InMode Ltd, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Lori A. Brightman..(Reitzas, Joshua)
July 11, 2022 Opinion or Order ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Joshua T. Reitzas re: Document No. #1 Complaint. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): all of the parties listed on the pleading were not entered on CM ECF;. Docket the event type Add Party to Pleading found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents... (pc)
July 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Magistrate Judge Paul E. Davison is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc)
July 11, 2022 Opinion or Order CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Cathy Seibel. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc)
July 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Case Designated ECF. (pc)
July 11, 2022 Opinion or Order ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Joshua T. Reitzas. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: DR Lori Brightman, InMode Ltd. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name contained a typographical error; party text was omitted;. (pc)
July 11, 2022 Opinion or Order ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney Joshua T. Reitzas to RE-FILE Document No. #1 Complaint. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the wrong event type was used to file the request for issuance of summons;. Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (pc)
July 11, 2022 Opinion or Order ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO ELECTRONICALLY FILE CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to Attorney Joshua T. Reitzas. Attorney must electronically file the Civil Cover Sheet. Use the event type Civil Cover Sheet found under the event list Other Documents. (pc)
July 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against InMode Ltd. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26389650)Document filed by Lori Brightman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Summons).(Reitzas, Joshua)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brightman v. InMode Ltd et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DR Lori Brightman
Represented By: Joshua T. Reitzas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dr. Lori A. Brightman
Represented By: Joseph P Garin
Represented By: Joshua T. Reitzas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: InMode Ltd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?