Kertzner v. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.
Plaintiff: Michal Kertzner
Defendant: Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.
Case Number: 7:2022cv06186
Filed: July 21, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Kenneth M Karas
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 26, 2022 Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc. waiver sent on 7/22/2022, answer due 9/20/2022. Document filed by Michal Kertzner..(Yusko, Robert)
July 22, 2022 Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Convergent Outsourcing, Inc...(pc)
July 22, 2022 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Robert Thomas Yusko. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: County code Rockland;. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the County code has been modified to XX Out of State;. (pc)
July 22, 2022 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Robert Thomas Yusko. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Michal Kertzner. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was omitted; Do not type party text as an alias. (pc)
July 22, 2022 Case Designated ECF. (pc)
July 22, 2022 Magistrate Judge Andrew E. Krause is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc)
July 22, 2022 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Kenneth M. Karas. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc)
July 21, 2022 Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Convergent Outsourcing, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Michal Kertzner..(Yusko, Robert)
July 21, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Yusko, Robert)
July 21, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26444284)Document filed by Michal Kertzner. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A).(Yusko, Robert)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kertzner v. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michal Kertzner
Represented By: Robert Thomas Yusko
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?