Kane v. Vi-Jon, LLC
Nancy Kane |
Vi-Jon, LLC |
7:2022cv07061 |
August 18, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Vincent L Briccetti |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING CONSOLIDATION AND SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT: NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the Parties hereto through their undersigned counsel, subject to approval of the Court, as follows: 1. The Patora v. Vi-Jon, LLC, Case No. 22-cv-6678 (VB) and Kane v. Vi-Jon, LLC, Case No. 22-cv-7061 (VB) actions are hereby consolidated under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a); and 2. Plaintiffs will file a Consolidated Amended Complaint in the first-filed Patora action within 14 days. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 9/26/2022) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:22-cv-06678-VB, 7:22-cv-07061-VB (mml) Modified on 9/27/2022 (mml). |
CONSOLIDATED MEMBER CASE: Create association to 7:22-cv-06678-VB. (mml) |
Filing 12 ORDER: On September 14, 2022, defendant in each of the above related actions filed motions to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). (Doc. #8 in case no. 22 CV 6678 and Doc. #7 in case no. 22 CV 7061). Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that, by no later than September 26, 2022, each plaintiff must notify the Court by letter whether she (i) intends to file an amended complaint in response to the motion to dismiss, or (ii) will rely on the complaint that is the subject of the motion to dismiss. If either plaintiff elects to file an amended complaint, she must file her amended complaint by no later than 14 days after notifying the Court of her intent to do so. Within 21 days of such amendment, defendant may either: (i) file an answer to the amended complaint; (ii) file a motion to dismiss the amended complaint; or (iii) notify the Court by letter that it is relying on the initially filed motion to dismiss. And as set forth herein. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 9/15/2022) (ama) |
Filing 11 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Other Affiliate VI-Jon Holding, Inc. for Vi-Jon, LLC. Document filed by Vi-Jon, LLC..(Vita, William) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Notice to Attorney William Edward Vita to RE-FILE Document No. #10 Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the corporate parent/other affiliate was not added;. Re-file the document using the event type Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement found under the event list Other Documents - select the correct filer/filers - attach the correct PDF - when prompted with the message "Are there any corporate parents or other affiliates?", select the Yes radio button - enter the corporate parent/other affiliate, click the Search button - select the correct corporate parent/other affiliate name from the search results list or if no person found, create a new corporate parent/other affiliate - select the party to whom the corporate parent/other affiliate should be linked - add corporate parent/other affiliate names one at a time. (lb) |
Filing 10 FILING ERROR - CORPORATE PARENT/OTHER AFFILIATE NOT ADDED - RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Vi-Jon, LLC..(Vita, William) Modified on 9/15/2022 (lb). |
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #7 MOTION to Dismiss . . Document filed by Vi-Jon, LLC..(Vita, William) |
Filing 8 AFFIRMATION of William E. Vita in Support re: #7 MOTION to Dismiss .. Document filed by Vi-Jon, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F).(Vita, William) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss . Document filed by Vi-Jon, LLC..(Vita, William) |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Vi-Jon, LLC. (sj) |
Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vba) |
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Vincent L. Briccetti. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (vba) |
CASE ACCEPTED AS RELATED. Create association to 7:22-cv-06678-VB. Notice of Assignment to follow. (vba) |
Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to VI-JON, LLC, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Nancy Kane..(Reich, Mark) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Mark Samuel Reich. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Jury Demand code n (None). The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Jury Demand code has been modified to p (Plaintiff). (vf) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Mark Samuel Reich. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Nancy Kane. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was omitted. (vf) |
Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Unassigned. (vf) |
CASE REFERRED TO Judge Vincent L. Briccetti as possibly related to 7:22-cv-6678. (vf) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney Mark Samuel Reich to RE-FILE Document No. #3 Request for Issuance of Summons. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Summons Caption Error. Plaintiff party text error in summons caption, party text does not correspond to pleading caption. Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (vf) |
Filing 4 STATEMENT OF RELATEDNESS re: that this action be filed as related to 7:22-cv-6678. Document filed by Nancy Kane..(Reich, Mark) |
Filing 3 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT - SUMMONS REQUEST - REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to VI-JON, LLC, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Nancy Kane..(Reich, Mark) Modified on 8/19/2022 (vf). |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Reich, Mark) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Vi-Jon, LLC. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26567817)Document filed by Nancy Kane..(Reich, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Kane v. Vi-Jon, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Nancy Kane | |
Represented By: | Mark Samuel Reich |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Vi-Jon, LLC | |
Represented By: | William Edward Vita |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.