Skurnick v. Fujifilm Medical Systems U.S.A. Inc.
| Mark Skurnick |
| Fujifilm Medical Systems U.S.A. Inc. |
| 7:2022cv07879 |
| September 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Philip M Halpern |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Davin Paul Cellura on behalf of Fujifilm Medical Systems U.S.A. Inc...(Cellura, Davin) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Daniel Sean Braverman on behalf of Fujifilm Medical Systems U.S.A. Inc...(Braverman, Daniel) |
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. Fujifilm Medical Systems U.S.A. Inc. waiver sent on 9/30/2022, answer due 11/29/2022. Document filed by Mark Skurnick..(Friedman, Joshua) |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Fujifilm Medical Systems U.S.A. Inc.. (vf) |
| Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
| Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Philip M. Halpern. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Fujifilm Medical Systems U.S.A. Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Mark Skurnick..(Friedman, Joshua) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Friedman, Joshua) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Fujifilm Medical Systems U.S.A. Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26681722)Document filed by Mark Skurnick. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Notice of Right to Sue).(Friedman, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Skurnick v. Fujifilm Medical Systems U.S.A. Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mark Skurnick | |
| Represented By: | Joshua Mathew Friedman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Fujifilm Medical Systems U.S.A. Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Daniel Sean Braverman |
| Represented By: | Davin Paul Cellura |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
