Dominguez et al v. Walsh et al
| Emily Dominguez, Janice Dominguez and Luz Marina Gutierrez |
| Edwin Day, Thomas E. Walsh, II, Deidre Smith Withers, John Doe 1, Graham Chapman, Dominic A. Crispino, Ed Day County Executive County of Rockland and County Attorney of Rockland County |
| 7:2022cv07916 |
| September 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Kenneth M Karas |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 vc Fed. Question: Violation of Constitutional Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 5. Mailed to: Janice Dominguez P.O. Box 376 Haverstraw, NY 10927; LuzMarina Gutierrez 6 Broadway Haverstraw, NY 10927. (dsh) |
Filing 5
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH LEAVE TO REPLEAD:The complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). If Plaintiff chooses to amend her complaint, either with or without Janice Dominguez and Luz Marina Gutierrez, she must submit the amended complaint to this Court's Pro Se Intake Unit within 30 days of the date of this order, caption the document as an "Amended Complaint," and label the document with docket number 22-CV-7916 (KMK). An Amended Complaint form is attached to this order. If Plaintiff fails to submit an amended complaint within the time allowed and does not show good cause to excuse such failure, the Court will enter a civil judgment consistent with this order and direct the Clerk of Court to terminate this matter. Although the Clerk of Court issued summonses in this case, no answers are required by any defendant until further notice by the Court. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 10/24/2022) (rro)
|
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Kenneth M. Karas. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (laq) |
| Magistrate Judge Paul E. Davison is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (laq) |
| CASE ACCEPTED AS RELATED. Create association to 7:22-cv-06443-KMK. Notice of Assignment to follow. (laq) |
| Filing 3 STATEMENT OF RELATEDNESS re: that this action be filed as related to 22cv6443. Document filed by Emily Dominguez. (sac) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE CONSENT TO RECEIVE ELECTRONIC SERVICE. The following party: Emily Dominguez consents to receive electronic service via the ECF system. Document filed by Emily Dominguez. (sac) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Graham Chapman, County Attorney of Rockland County, Dominic A. Crispino, Edwin Day, John Doe 1, Thomas E. Walsh, II, Deidre Smith Withers. (Filing Fee $402.00, Receipt Number 115) Document filed by Emily Dominguez. (sac) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Graham Chapman, County Attorney of Rockland County, Dominic A. Crispino, Edwin Day, Thomas E. Walsh, II, Deidre Smith Withers. (ok) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
