Triumph IP LLC v. U.E. Systems, Inc.
Triumph IP LLC |
U.E. Systems, Inc. |
7:2022cv09298 |
October 30, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Kenneth M Karas |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. U.E. Systems, Inc. served on 11/30/2022, answer due 12/21/2022. Service was accepted by Robin Hutt-Banks, Managing Agent. Document filed by Triumph IP LLC..(Loaknauth, Nicholas) |
Filing 9 ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE granting #8 Motion for David R. Bennett to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The motion of David R. Bennett for admission to practice Pro Hac Vice in the above captioned action is granted. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Applicant is admitted to practice Pro Hac Vice in the above captioned case in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. All attorneys appearing before this Court are subject to the Local Rules of this Court discipline of attorneys. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 11/9/22) (yv) |
>>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #8 MOTION for David Randolph Bennett to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-26927567. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (sgz) |
Filing 8 MOTION for David Randolph Bennett to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-26927567. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Triumph IP LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Admission - Bennett, #2 Affidavit Affidavit of David R. Bennett, #3 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order).(Bennett, David) |
Filing 7 AO 120 FORM PATENT - CASE OPENING - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 290, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a court action has been filed on the following patent(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)..(pc) |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to U.E. Systems, Inc...(pc) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Nicholas Netram Loaknauth. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Triump IP LLC. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name contained a typographical error;. (pc) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Nicholas Netram Loaknauth. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Office code Foley Square;. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Office code has been modified to White Plains;. (pc) |
Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Kenneth M. Karas. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc) |
Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to U.E. Systems, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Triump IP LLC..(Loaknauth, Nicholas) |
Filing 4 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Triump IP LLC..(Loaknauth, Nicholas) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Loaknauth, Nicholas) |
Filing 2 AO 120 FORM PATENT - NOTICE OF SUBMISSION BY ATTORNEY. AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark for case opening submitted to court for review..(Loaknauth, Nicholas) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against U.E. Systems, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-26891839)Document filed by Triump IP LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: US Pat. No. 7,177,291, #2 Exhibit B: US Pat. No. 7,523,479).(Loaknauth, Nicholas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Triumph IP LLC v. U.E. Systems, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Triumph IP LLC | |
Represented By: | Nicholas Netram Loaknauth |
Represented By: | David R Bennett |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: U.E. Systems, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.