Wise et al v. Combe Incorporated
Rosalind Wise and Moona Choudry |
Combe Incorporated |
7:2022cv10787 |
December 21, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Philip M Halpern |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity Action |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER: granting #8 Letter Motion for Extension of Time. Application granted. Defendant shall answer or move with respect to the Complaint in accordance with the Court's Individual Practices by March 22, 2023. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion sequence pending at Doc. 8. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Philip M. Halpern on 2/15/2023) (ama) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Combe Incorporated answer due 3/22/2023. (ama) |
Filing 8 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time addressed to Judge Philip M. Halpern from Andrew W. Gust dated February 14, 2023. Document filed by Combe Incorporated..(Gust, Andrew) |
Filing 7 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Combe Incorporated..(Gust, Andrew) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Andrew Gust on behalf of Combe Incorporated..(Gust, Andrew) |
Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. Combe Incorporated waiver sent on 12/22/2022, answer due 2/21/2023. Document filed by Rosalind Wise; Moona Choudry..(Roberts, Max) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Combe Incorporated. (vf) |
Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Max Stuart Roberts. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Rosalind Wise, Moona Choudry. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was omitted. (vf) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Philip M. Halpern. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Max Stuart Roberts. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Dollar Demand $5,000,001,000; County code Westchester. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Dollar Demand has been modified to 5,000,000; the County code has been modified to XX Out of State. (vf) |
Magistrate Judge Paul E. Davison is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Combe Incorporated, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Moona Choudry, Rosalind Wise..(Roberts, Max) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Roberts, Max) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Combe Incorporated. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-27121466)Document filed by Rosalind Wise, Moona Choudry. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Demand Letter).(Roberts, Max) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.