King v. Romero et al
| Plaintiff deltoro king and Deltoro King |
| Defendant 1 of 2 juan sebastian romero, Defendant 2 of 2 Phenix Auto Transport LLC, Juan Sebastian Zuluaga Romero and Phenix Auto Transport LLC |
| 7:2022cv10935 |
| December 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Philip M Halpern |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 au Diversity-Auto Negligence |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CASE REMANDED OUT from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of New York to the State Court - Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Westchester. Sent certified copy of docket entries and remand order. Mailed via UPS Tracking Number 1ZE22E533710076383 on 1/3/2023. (tg) |
Filing 3
ORDER: Based upon the foregoing, the Court concludes that Defendants failed to satisfy their burden of establishing that the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. Removal is therefore improper. Accordingly, this action is REMANDED to the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Westchester. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to send a copy of this Order to the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Westchester, and to close this action. All pending matters are hereby terminated. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Philip M. Halpern on 12/30/2022) (tg) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Bleecker, Renaud) |
| Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
| Magistrate Judge Andrew E. Krause is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Renaud T. Bleecker. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Phenix Auto Transport LLC, juan sebastian romero; deltoro king. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name contained a typographical error; party role was entered incorrectly; party name entered incorrectly; party text removed. (vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO ELECTRONICALLY FILE CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to Attorney Renaud T. Bleecker. Attorney must electronically file the Civil Cover Sheet. Use the event type Civil Cover Sheet found under the event list Other Documents. (vf) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Philip M. Halpern. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Supreme Court, County of Westchester. Case Number: 63590/2022. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-27140232).Document filed by Phenix Auto Transport LLC, juan sebastian romero. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A-Summons & Complaint, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B-Answer & Demands, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C-Bill of Particulars, redacted).(Bleecker, Renaud) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
