Anoymous v. Anonymous
| Anonymous |
| 7:2023cv02253 |
| March 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Philip M Halpern |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 tn Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER Accordingly, this action is dismissed for failure to comply with ECF Rules 6 and 14. Plaintiff may, if they be so advised, commence a new action in accordance with ECF Rules 6 and 14. Plaintiff is referred to the ECF Help Desk and/or the Clerk's Office for procedural assistance in commencing the action. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Philip M. Halpern on 3/17/2023) (jca)
|
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Philip M. Halpern. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo) |
| Magistrate Judge Andrew E. Krause is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo) |
| Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Matthew J. Blit. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Anoymous. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party role was entered incorrectly;. (jgo) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Matthew J. Blit. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: County code Westchester;. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the County code has been modified to XX Out of State;. (jgo) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Blit, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 FIRST MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #2 FIRST MOTION Leave to Proceed Under Pseudonym Anonymous. . Document filed by Anonymous..(Blit, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 FIRST MOTION Leave to Proceed Under Pseudonym Anonymous. Document filed by Anonymous..(Blit, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Anonymous. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-27476895)Document filed by Anonymous..(Blit, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Anoymous v. Anonymous | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Anonymous | |
| Represented By: | Matthew J. Blit |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
