Peale v. New York State
Peter Peale |
New York State and Steven A Nigrelli |
7:2023cv02292 |
March 17, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Kenneth M Karas |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Mailed a copy of #7 Order on Motion for Permission for Electronic Case Filing to Peter Peale at P.O. Box 767, Peekskill, NY 10566. (kh) |
|
Filing 6 MOTION for Permission for Peter Peale to participate in electronic case filing in this case. Document filed by Peter Peale. (ok) |
|
|
Magistrate Judge Paul E. Davison is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (aea) |
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Kenneth M. Karas. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (aea) |
Pro Se Payment of Fee Processed: $402.00 Check processed by the Finance Department on 03/24/2023, Receipt Number 14255. (stt) |
Filing 2 COVER SHEET filed..(rdz) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against New York State. Document filed by Peter Peale..(rdz) |
Case Designated ECF. (rdz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.