Dutchess County Water and Wastewater Authority et al v. The 3M Company et al
| Dutchess County Water and Wastewater Authority and Dalton Farms Water System |
| The 3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation, Arkema Inc., Archroma U.S. Inc., BASF Corporation, BASF Corporation, as successor in interest to Ciba, Inc., Buckeye Fire Equipment Company, Carrier Global Corporation, Chemdesign Products Inc., Chemguard Inc., Chemicals Inc., Clariant Corporation, Clariant Corporation as successor in interest to Sandoz Chemical Corporation, Corteva, Inc., Corteva, Inc. as successor in interest to DuPont Chemical Solutions Enterprise, Deepwater Chemicals, Inc., Dupont De Nemours, Inc., DuPont De Nemours, Inc. as successor in interest to DuPont Chemical Solutions Enterprise, Dynax Corporation, E.I. DuPont De Nemours and Company, E.I. DuPont De Nemours and Company as successor in interest to DuPont Chemical Solutions Enterprise, Kidde-Fenwal, Inc., Kidde-Fenwal, Inc. as successor in interest to Kidde Fire Fighting, Inc., Nation Ford Chemical Company, National Foam, Inc., The Chemours Company, The Chemours Company as successor in interest to DuPont Chemical Solutions Enterprise, The Chemours Company FC, LLC, The Chemours Company FC, LLC as successor in interest to DuPont Chemical Solutions Enterprise, Tyco Fire Products, LP, Tyco Fire Products, LP as successor in interest to The Ansul Company, Doe Defendants 1-20, fictitious names whose present identities are unknown and Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. |
| 7:2023cv02467 |
| March 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Kenneth M Karas |
| Tort Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 nr Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Received e-mail from the United States District Court - District of South Carolina acknowledging receipt of transferred case. Assigned Case Number: 2:23-cv-01588, filed on 4/17/2023. (tro) |
Filing 6
CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER OUT ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL...transferring this action from the U.S.D.C. - S.D.N.Y to the United States District Court - District of South Carolina. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 4/13/2023) (vba)
|
| MDL TRANSFER OUT ELECTRONICALLY: to the United States District Court - District of South Carolina.(vba) |
|
Filing 5
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto and their undersigned counsel that if this action is transferred to the In re Aqueous Film-Forming Foams Products Liability multi-district litigation ("AFFF MDL"), then the deadline for Defendants to move, answer, or otherwise respond to the Summons and Complaint shall be in accordance with the established rules and procedures in the AFFF MDL. Should the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation decline to transfer this action to the AFFF MDL, Defendants shall have through and including the 28th day after such disposition by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint. SO ORDERED. Motions terminated: #4 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Notice of Removal, addressed to Judge Kenneth M. Karas from Nicole G. McDonough, Esq. dated March 30, 2023. filed by Tyco Fire Products, LP, Tyco Fire Products, LP as successor in interest to The Ansul Company, Chemguard Inc.. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 3/30/23) (yv)
|
| Filing 4 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Notice of Removal, addressed to Judge Kenneth M. Karas from Nicole G. McDonough, Esq. dated March 30, 2023. Document filed by Chemguard Inc., Tyco Fire Products, LP, Tyco Fire Products, LP as successor in interest to The Ansul Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order on Consent to Extend Time to Respond).(McDonough, Nicole) |
| Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
| Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Kenneth M. Karas. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc) |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE. Document filed by Chemguard Inc., Tyco Fire Products, LP, Tyco Fire Products, LP as successor in interest to The Ansul Company..(McDonough, Nicole) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(McDonough, Nicole) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Supreme Court, County of Dutchess. Case Number: 2022-5329. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-27509549).Document filed by Chemguard Inc., Tyco Fire Products, LP as successor in interest to The Ansul Company, Tyco Fire Products, LP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A (State Court Complaint)).(McDonough, Nicole) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
