Pepsico, Inc. v. The Lubrizol Corporation
| PEPSICO, INC., and PepsiCo, Inc. |
| The Lubrizol Corporation |
| 7:2023cv02963 |
| April 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Laura Taylor Swain |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
AMENDED CASE OPENING ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSING ORDER: New civil actions filed electronically that contain the following deficiencies may be administratively closed without prejudice and summonses may not be issued unless the deficiency is corrected within five (5) days of electronic transmission by the Clerk of a Notice of Deficient Filing: The case initiating document contains the wrong document - an illegible or unreadable document or no document.. Where a new civil action is administratively closed for a reason listed above and the party cures the deficiency within 60 days of the case closing, the party should seek to reopen the case by electronically filing a Notice of Application to Reopen Case through the ECF system. Such Notice shall describe the efforts to cure the deficiency and seek to reopen the case. The Clerk shall review such Notice and, if the deficiency is satisfactorily cured, reopen and randomly reassign the case. Applications to reopen such administratively closed cases filed after 60 days of closing must proceed by motion. Administrative Reopening due by 6/20/2023. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on January 14, 2021) (vf)
|
| Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
|
Filing 7
MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: #6 Letter filed by PepsiCo, Inc. ENDORSEMENT: The foregoing request is granted. The Clerk of Courtshall refund the filing fee of $602.00 to plaintiff's counsel. This resolves docket entry no. 6. SOORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 4/12/2023) (vfr) Transmission to Finance Unit (Cashiers) for processing.
|
| Filing 6 LETTER addressed to Judge Laura Taylor Swain from Alison R. Ashmore dated April 11, 2023 re: Civil matter opened by mistake. Document filed by PepsiCo, Inc...(Ashmore, Alison) |
| Filing 5 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY FILED IN THE WRONG CASE MOTION to Quash . Document filed by PepsiCo, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Subpoena and Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - Comm between Biener and Hollander, #3 Exhibit 3 - Comm between Schropp and Hollander).(Ashmore, Alison) Modified on 4/12/2023 (gp). |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Alison Ashmore to RE-FILE Document No. #1 Petition (Other),. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the wrong event type was used to file the pleading; The document that was filed was not a Petition. File the Motion to Quash Subpeona under the correct Event Type. If the deficiency/deficiencies are not corrected within five (5) days per Amended Standing Order 15-mc-00131 this case will be administratively closed. Initial Pleading due by 4/17/2023. (pc) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Alison Ashmore. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: County code Westchester;. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the County code has been modified to New York;. (pc) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Alison Ashmore. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: PEPSICO, INC.,. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name was entered in all caps;. (pc) |
| >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #4 MOTION for Alison Rae Ashmore to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-27581522. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (sgz) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Alison Rae Ashmore to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-27581522. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by PEPSICO, INC.,. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Alison R. Ashmore, #2 Exhibit 1 - Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Text of Proposed Order Granting Motion of Alison R. Ashmore to Appear Pro Hac Vice).(Ashmore, Alison) Modified on 4/10/2023 (sgz) |
| Filing 3 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by PEPSICO, INC.,..(Ashmore, Alison) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Ashmore, Alison) |
| Filing 1 FILING ERROR - WRONG EVENT TYPE SELECTED FROM MENU - PETITION Motion to Quash Def's Subpoena and For Protective Order. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-27580872).Document filed by PEPSICO, INC.,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Subpoena and Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 Comm between Biener and Hollander, #3 Exhibit 3 Comm between Schropp and Hollander).(Ashmore, Alison) Modified on 4/10/2023 (pc). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
