Lustigman v. Bank of America, N.A.
| Israel Lustigman |
| Bank of America, N.A. |
| 7:2023cv07902 |
| September 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Kenneth M Karas |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Mailed a copy of #8 Stipulation and Order of Voluntary Dismissal, to Israel Lustigman, 77 Southfield Falls, Monroe, NY 10950. (vn) |
Filing 8
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: It is hereby stipulated and agreed, by and between Plaintiff Israel Lustigman ("Plaintiff") and counsel for Defendant Bank of America, N.A. ("BANA") that, pursuant to FRCP 41, this action is hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either party. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 9/15/23) (yv)
|
| ***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. #7 Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal,, was reviewed and referred to Judge Kenneth M. Karas for approval for the following reason(s): the plaintiff(s) filed their voluntary dismissal in a Pro Se case. (nd) |
| Filing 7 STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) Bank of America, N.A. and without costs pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Bank of America, N.A.. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Massand, Shan) |
| Mailed a copy of #6 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer, to Israel Lustigman at 77 Southfield Falls Monroe, NY 10950. (sha) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer ,move or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint addressed to Magistrate Judge Victoria Reznik from Shan P. Massand dated September 11, 2023. Granted. So Ordered. #1 Notice of Removal,. Bank of America, N.A. answer due 10/13/2023 (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 9/12/2023) (vfr)
|
| Filing 5 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer ,move or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint addressed to Magistrate Judge Victoria Reznik from Shan P. Massand dated September 11, 2023. Document filed by Bank of America, N.A...(Massand, Shan) |
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Kenneth M. Karas. Judge Philip M. Halpern is no longer assigned to the case. (vba) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Shan P. Massand. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: County code Monroe. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the County code has been modified to Orange. (vf) |
| Magistrate Judge Victoria Reznik is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Philip M. Halpern. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
| Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
| Filing 3 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent BAC North America Holding Company, Corporate Parent Bank of America Corporation, Corporate Parent NB Holdings Corporation, Other Affiliate Berkshire Hathaway Inc., 3555 Farnam Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68131 for Bank of America, N.A.. Document filed by Bank of America, N.A...(Massand, Shan) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Massand, Shan) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Orange. Case Number: EF004866-2023. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-28248045).Document filed by Bank of America, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A State Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit B Copy of the Notice to State Court).(Massand, Shan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lustigman v. Bank of America, N.A. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Israel Lustigman | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Bank of America, N.A. | |
| Represented By: | Shan P. Massand |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
