Matamoros et al v. M.G Tile & Marble Inc. et al
| Walter Ramirez Matamoros and Hugo Alirio Sacrapal Alonzo |
| M.G Tile & Marble Inc., Miguel Garcia and Miguel Angel Armas, Sr. |
| 7:2024cv02298 |
| March 27, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Nelson Stephen Roman |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 fl Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Miguel Angel Armas, Sr, Miguel Garcia, M.G Tile & Marble Inc...(jgo) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Nelson Stephen Roman. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo) |
| Magistrate Judge Andrew E. Krause is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo) |
| Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Katelyn Marie Schillaci on behalf of Hugo Alirio Sacrapal Alonzo(on behalf of all others similarly situated), Hugo Alirio Sacrapal Alonzo(individually), Walter Ramirez Matamoros(individually), Walter Ramirez Matamoros(on behalf of all others similarly situated)..(Schillaci, Katelyn) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Avraham Y. Scher on behalf of Hugo Alirio Sacrapal Alonzo(on behalf of all others similarly situated), Hugo Alirio Sacrapal Alonzo(individually), Walter Ramirez Matamoros(individually), Walter Ramirez Matamoros(on behalf of all others similarly situated)..(Scher, Avraham) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by James Patrick Peter O'Donnell on behalf of Hugo Alirio Sacrapal Alonzo(on behalf of all others similarly situated), Hugo Alirio Sacrapal Alonzo(individually), Walter Ramirez Matamoros(individually), Walter Ramirez Matamoros(on behalf of all others similarly situated)..(O'Donnell, James) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to M.G. TILE & MARBLE INC. and MIGUEL GARCIA and MIGUEL ANGEL ARMAS, as individuals, re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by Hugo Alirio Sacrapal Alonzo(on behalf of all others similarly situated), Hugo Alirio Sacrapal Alonzo(individually), Walter Ramirez Matamoros(individually), Walter Ramirez Matamoros(on behalf of all others similarly situated)..(Avshalumov, Roman) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Avshalumov, Roman) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Miguel Angel Armas, Sr, Miguel Garcia, M.G Tile & Marble Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 405.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-29138318)Document filed by Walter Ramirez Matamoros(individually), Hugo Alirio Sacrapal Alonzo(on behalf of all others similarly situated), Hugo Alirio Sacrapal Alonzo(individually), Walter Ramirez Matamoros(on behalf of all others similarly situated)..(Avshalumov, Roman) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
