USA v. Toyota Tacoma
| USA |
| One 2000 Toyota Tacoma Automobile, Vehicle Identification Number 4TAWM72N4YZ631871 |
| Maria Gonzalez and Manuel Hernandez |
| 1:2001cv00719 |
| July 10, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Buffalo Office |
| Hugh B. Scott |
| William M. Skretny |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
ORDER ACCEPTING the 60 Report and Recommendation and DENYING the Government's 49 Motion to Strike. Signed by William M. Skretny U.S.D.J. on 8/17/2009. (MEAL)
|
|
Filing
60
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 49 MOTION to Strike Claim filed by USA. Objections due ten days from receipt. Signed by Hon. Hugh B. Scott on 7/10/09. (JRA)
|
|
Filing
51
DECISION AND ORDER REFERRING this case to Judge Scott pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1)(B) and (C) nunc pro tunc to 9/24/2008; ACCEPTING Judge Scott's 43 Report and Recommendation ; DEEMING any claim to the proceeds from the sale of the defendant automobile filed or asserted by Maria Gonzalez as ABANDONED and DISMISSED. Signed by William M. Skretny U.S.D.J. on 4/17/2009. (MEAL)
|
|
Filing
43
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS as to dismissal of claim filed by Maria Gonzales. Objections due ten days from receipt. Signed by Hon. Hugh B. Scott on 3/3/09. (JRA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
