Gorzynski v. Jetblue Airways Corporation
Case Number: 1:2003cv00774
Filed: October 15, 2003
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Office: Buffalo Office
Presiding Judge: Richard J. Arcara
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 141 ORDER denying 113 Motion to Change Venue. Signed by Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford on 04/07/2014. (CDH)
April 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE HUGH B. SCOTTORDER re 72 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Diane GorzynskiPlaintiff's application to recover reasonable motion expenses (Docket No. 72) is denied.So Ordered. Signed by Hon. Hugh B. Scott on 4/12/2012. (DRH)
March 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 71 ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE HUGH B. SCOTTORDER granting 67 Motion to CompelPlaintiff's motion to compel is granted.Plaintiff's application to recover her reasonable motion expenses is due within 10 days of entry of this Order, or by 3/15/2012; defendant's response is due within 21 days of entry of this Order, or by 3/26/2012, and fee application will be deemed submitted.So Ordered. Signed by Hon. Hugh B. Scott on 3/5/2012. (DRH)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gorzynski v. Jetblue Airways Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?