Collins v. Goord et al
Case Number: 1:2005cv00039
Filed: January 21, 2005
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Office: Buffalo Office
Presiding Judge: H. Kenneth Schroeder
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 63 DECISION AND ORDER denying 51 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 52 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Hon. H. Kenneth Schroeder, Jr on 9/19/2011. (KER)
May 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 46 DECISION AND ORDER directing plaintiff to contact the AAG no later than 5/25/2010 to reschedule his deposition and warning plaintiff that his failure to submit to a deposition on the rescheduled date shall result in sanctions, including but not limit ed to dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The deadline for completing depositions is extended through 6/25/2010. Signed by Hon. H. Kenneth Schroeder, Jr on 5/17/2010. (KER)
June 24, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 13 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Hon. H. Kenneth Schroeder, Jr on 6/24/2009. (KER)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Collins v. Goord et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?