Guilbert v. Sennet et al
Case Number: 1:2005cv00153
Filed: March 8, 2005
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Office: Buffalo Office
Presiding Judge: John T. Elfvin
Presiding Judge: Leslie G. Foschio
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 3, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 66 DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING 49 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; DISMISSING the Amended Complaint with prejudice; DIRECTING the Clerk of the Court to close this case. Signed by William M. Skretny U.S.D.J. on 7/30/2009. (MEAL)
April 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 61 FINAL SCHEDULING ORDER on 49 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's Responses is due 4/27/2009. Signed by William M. Skretny U.S.D.J. on 4/13/2009. (MEAL)
March 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 60 DECISION AND ORDER DENYING 59 Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel; DIRECTING Plaintiff to file a response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment by 4/10/2009. Signed by William M. Skretny U.S.D.J. on 3/25/2009. (MEAL)
March 18, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER denying 56 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Hon. Leslie G. Foschio on 3/18/2009. (SDW)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Guilbert v. Sennet et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?