West et al v. Goord et al
| 1:2005cv00447 |
| June 21, 2005 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Buffalo Office |
| Richard J. Arcara |
| Hugh B. Scott |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
176
DECISION AND ORDER: Plaintiff's 163 Motion for Attorney Fees is GRANTED IN PART. Counsel is awarded $27,750.27 in attorneys' fees and $3,185.47 in costs. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 6/11/2018. (AFM)
|
|
Filing
159
DECISION AND ORDER: For the reasons stated, the Court grants Defendants 153 Motion to Dismiss and grants judgment in favor of Plaintiff James West against Defendant DOCCS in the amount of one dollar ($1.00). The Clerk of Court is directed t o enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff, terminate the open motions at 141 , 142 , 144 , and 146 , and close the case. The Court retains ancillary jurisdiction to resolve any disputes between the parties regarding interest and costs.SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 1/23/18. (JO)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-
|
|
Filing
115
DECISION AND ORDER: Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 102) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Specifically, the Motion is DENIED with respect to Plaintiff's claims alleging discrimination and retaliation in violation of the ADA and the Rehabilitation Act. The Motion is GRANTED with respect to the remaining causes of action, and Plaintiff's First Amendment, Title VII, Due Process, Equal Protection, Deliberate Indifference, and Conspiracy claims are dismissed. Defendants Case, Keefe, Lauber, and Pabon remain in this action as relevant to Plaintiff's ADA and Rehabilitation Act claims. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Henrich are dismissed by operation of Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(1), and all other named Defendants are dismissed from this action in accordance with the above Decision and Order. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 7/31/17. (SCE)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER denying defendants' motion to dismiss, adopting Report and Recommendation re 62 directing that the U.s Marshal serve the remaining defendants and that defendants shall respond to the Second Amended Complaint. The case is referred back to Magistrate Judge Scott for further proceedings. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 4/6/2012. (JMB)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER Clerk of Court is directed to send to Plaintiffs Abdul M. Shariff and Divine C. Allah, a new form application to proceed as a poor person and a prisoner authorization; Plaintiffs Shariff and Allah must either submit the application or pay the f ull filing fee by 7/27/05; failure to comply will result in dismissal of either one or both of the defendants without further order; Plaintiff James West has until 7/27/05 to submit another authorization directing the full payment of $250.00 instead of the $150.00 filing fee previously authorized by him; failure to comply will result in the dismissal of Plaintiff James West from this action. . Signed by Hon. John T. Elfvin on 6/27/05. (SG, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: West et al v. Goord et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
