Singh v. New York State Department of Tax & Finance et al
| 1:2006cv00299 |
| May 9, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Buffalo Office |
| John T. Curtin |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
155
DECISION AND ORDER granting Defendants' [150-52] MOTIONS for Summary Judgment. This case is dismissed in its entirety. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants and to close this case. (Clerk to follow up.) Signed by Hon. John T. Curtin on 11/29/2012. (JEC)
|
|
Filing
142
ORDER granting 139 Defendants' Motion for Protective Order and denying Defendant ECC's 140 Motion to Compel Plaintiff to submit to a mental examination without prejudice to renew pending the outcome of Defendants' dispositive motions, to be filed by 7/13/2012. Signed by Hon. John T. Curtin on 6/18/2012. (JEC)
|
|
Filing
107
DECISION AND ORDER granting Defendant State's 52 Motion to Dismiss the Title VII claim against Constance Marcus with prejudice. Defendant Marcus is dismissed from this case. The 53 Motion by the Brisbane defendants to dismiss the amended c omplaint is granted with prejudice, and the Brisbane defendants are dismissed from this case. The 59 Motion by Jacqueline Bogdan to dismiss the amended complaint is granted with prejudice, and defendant Bogdan is dismissed from this case. Defenda nt Bogdan's motion is denied to the extent it seeks Rule 11 sanctions. The 74 Motion by the IRS to dismiss the amended complaint is granted with prejudice, and the IRS is dismissed from this case. The 82 Motion by Ajit Singh to dismiss the amended complaint is granted with prejudice, and defendant Ajit Singh is dismissed from this case. Plaintiff's consipiracy claims against non-moving defendants Erie County, ECC, and Reuter, and all claims against defendants O'Sullivan and Stolzenburg, are dismissed with prejudice, and defendants O'Sullivan and Stolzenburg are dismissed from the case. Plaintiff's 73 Motion is denied to the extent it seeks leave to submit a second amended complaint, and granted to the exte nt of seeking leave to supplement in order to allow pleadings to reflect additional allegations. Any further discovery shall be completed by 2/3/2012. Dispositive motions shall be filed by defendants by 3/2/2012. Plaintiff's responses shall be filed by 4/6/2012; and replies, if desired, shall be filed by 4/23/2012, at which time the matter will be deemed to be submitted without oral argument. Signed by Hon. John T. Curtin on 10/21/2011. (JEC)
|
|
Filing
96
DECISION AND ORDER, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 82 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Ajit Singh, 74 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Ju risdiction filed by Internal Revenue Service, 73 MOTION for Leave to File filed by Deeksha K. Singh, 53 MOTION to Dismiss Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint filed by Brisbane Consulting Group, LLC, Louis J. Cercone, Jr., 52 MOTION to Di smiss MOTION for More Definite Statement MOTION to Sever wtih cert of service filed by New York State Department of Tax & Finance, Constance Marcus, New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, 59 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Jacqueline Bogdan. Objections due fourteen days from receipt. Signed by Hon. Leslie G. Foschio on 7/28/2011. (SDW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Singh v. New York State Department of Tax & Finance et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
