Shepard v. The State Education Department/The University of the State of New York et al
| Brenda J. Shepard |
| The State Education Department/The University of the State of New York, Paul F. Kelly and Richard P. Mills |
| 1:2007cv00456 |
| July 13, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Buffalo Office |
| Erie |
| John T. Curtin |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
123
-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-ORDER granting 117 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendation re 122 . Clerk of Court to close case. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 5/3/2013. (JMB)
|
|
Filing
104
AMENDED ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, denying defendant Springville-Griffith Institute Central School District Board of Education's motion to dismiss insofar as it seeks dismissal of the amended complaint as t ime-barred; and granting defendants' The State Education Department/The University of the State of New York, Paul F. Kelly and Richard P Mills' motion to dismiss. The Clerk of Court shall terminate defendants The Sttae Education Department/The University of the State of New York, Paul F. Kelly and Richard P. Mills. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 9/30/2011. (JMB)
|
|
Filing
103
ORDER denying 49 Motion to Dismiss; granting 61 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 96 Report and Recommendation; adopting Amended Report and Recommendation re 97 Case is referred back to Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 9/29/2011. (JMB)
|
|
Filing
97
AMENDED DECISION AND ORDER / REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 49 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Springville-Griffith Institute Central School District Board of Education, 61 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Richard P. Mills, The State Education Department/The University of the State of New York, Paul F. Kelly. Amended to correct a misstatement in the Statement of Facts set forth in the previous Decision and Order/Report and Recommendation 96 at p. 4 (erroneously referring to Plaintiff as challenging "the SRO Decision by filing an administrative complaint with the School District as required under IDEA...."). Objections due fourteen days from receipt. Signed by Hon. Leslie G. Foschio on 8/18/2011. (SDW)
|
|
Filing
96
DECISION AND ORDER / REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. School District's motion (Doc. No. 49), insofar as it seeks dismissal of the Amended Complaint for improper service, is DISMISSED as moot, and Plaintiff is GRANTED an extension of time to re-serve Defendant School District with the summons and Amended Complaint within 30 days of receipt of this Decision and Order and Report and Recommendation, and, alternatively, insofar as it seeks dismissal of the Amended Complaint as time-barred, should be DENIED; State Defendants' motion (Doc. No. 61), should be GRANTED. Objections due fourteen days from receipt. Signed by Hon. Leslie G. Foschio on 8/11/2011. (SDW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
