Venugopal v. Sharadha Terry Products, LTD.
Plaintiff: Ramaswamy Venugopal
Defendant: Sharadha Terry Products, LTD.
Case Number: 1:2007cv00484
Filed: July 26, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Office: Buffalo Office
County: XX Outside US
Presiding Judge: John T. Curtin
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 22, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION denying 10 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss or transfer. A status telephone conference shall be held on 6/24/2009 at 11:15 a.m. Signed by Hon. John T. Curtin on 5/18/2009. (JEC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Venugopal v. Sharadha Terry Products, LTD.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ramaswamy Venugopal
Represented By: Jennifer Meredith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sharadha Terry Products, LTD.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?