Davidson v. Canfield et al
Ronald Davidson |
Wesley Canfield, M.D., Calvin West, Glenn Goord, Lester Wright, M.D., Anthony J. Annucci, John Does 1-10 and Joseph Hatef, DPM |
1:2007cv00599 |
September 12, 2007 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Buffalo Office |
Ulster |
William M. Skretny |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 92 -CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-ORDER. Signed by Hon. H. Kenneth Schroeder, Jr on 6/21/2013. (KER) |
Filing 91 -CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-ORDER directing attorney Andre Ramon Soleil to provide status of representation to the Court. Signed by Hon. H. Kenneth Schroeder, Jr on 5/22/2013. (KER) |
Filing 86 DECISION AND ORDER denying 61 Motion to Compel; denying 68 Motion to Compel. Signed by Hon. H. Kenneth Schroeder, Jr. on December 6, 2012. (APG) |
Filing 82 DECISION AND ORDER denying 60 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying 60 Motion for Sanctions; denying 60 Motion. Signed by Hon. H. Kenneth Schroeder, Jr. on December 4, 2012. (APG) |
Filing 75 DECISION AND ORDER 48 Motion to Amend or Correct; 62 Motion to Amend. Signed by Hon. H. Kenneth Schroeder, Jr. on September 25, 2012. (APG) |
Filing 59 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 37 Motion for Protective Order; denying 39 Motion for Contempt. Signed by Hon. H. Kenneth Schroeder, Jr on 3/16/2012. (KER) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.