Santiago v. Coniglio
Plaintiff: Milton Santiago
Defendant: Gerald Coniglio
Case Number: 1:2007cv00791
Filed: November 27, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Office: Prisoner: Civil Rights Office
County: Chemung
Presiding Judge: William M. Skretny
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 39 DECISION AND ORDER granting nunc pro tunc 36 Motion for Extension of Time to File a Reply and granting 26 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Hon. Jeremiah J. McCarthy on 10/29/09. (Court has mailed a copy of this Decision and Order to Plaintiff. THE CLERK OF THE COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THE CASE. (DAZ)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Santiago v. Coniglio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Milton Santiago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gerald Coniglio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?