Cunningham v. St. Bonaventure University

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Western District Cunningham v. St. Bonaventure University

Cunningham v. St. Bonaventure University

Plaintiff:	Mary F. Cunningham
Defendant:	St. Bonaventure University
Case Number:	1:2007cv00823
Filed:	November 2, 2007
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of New York
Office:	Buffalo Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	John T. Curtin
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jury Demanded By:	Both

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 7, 2011	Filing 77 DECISION AND ORDER granting defendant's 71 Motion to Dismiss. The case is dismissed, and the Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendant. Signed by Hon. John T. Curtin on 4/6/2011. (JEC)
November 16, 2010	Filing 65 DECISION AND ORDER denying without prejudice Defendant's 60 Motion to Dismiss. Defense counsel is directed to serve on Plaintiff and file with the court a proposed procedural framework and schedule for accomplishing Plaintiff's depositio n by telephone. The court will reserve the right to require Plaintiff to appear in Buffalo for a follow-up deposition upon a showing by Defendant that the telephone deposition was not accomplished in a meaningful manner. Plaintiff's failure to cooperate with the telephone deposition process or otherwise refrain from from conduct, causing further unreasonable delay in the proceedings, will be considered as grounds for immediate dismissal of the action. Signed by Hon. John T. Curtin on 11/10/2010.

Date Filed

Document Text

April 7, 2011

Filing 77 DECISION AND ORDER granting defendant's 71 Motion to Dismiss. The case is dismissed, and the Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendant. Signed by Hon. John T. Curtin on 4/6/2011. (JEC)

November 16, 2010

Filing 65 DECISION AND ORDER denying without prejudice Defendant's 60 Motion to Dismiss. Defense counsel is directed to serve on Plaintiff and file with the court a proposed procedural framework and schedule for accomplishing Plaintiff's depositio n by telephone. The court will reserve the right to require Plaintiff to appear in Buffalo for a follow-up deposition upon a showing by Defendant that the telephone deposition was not accomplished in a meaningful manner. Plaintiff's failure to cooperate with the telephone deposition process or otherwise refrain from from conduct, causing further unreasonable delay in the proceedings, will be considered as grounds for immediate dismissal of the action. Signed by Hon. John T. Curtin on 11/10/2010.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cunningham v. St. Bonaventure University
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mary F. Cunningham
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: St. Bonaventure University
Represented By:	Christopher D. Ahlers
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?