Mason v. Roof et al
| Robert Mason |
| A. Roof, G. Barns, S. Proctor, T. Abate, S. Barraco, B. Fisher, Parish, Sullivan, V. Bailey, Mott and Nevies |
| 1:2008cv00208 |
| May 5, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Seneca |
| Hugh B. Scott |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
ORDER that the caption shall be amended to reflect that the proper name of defendant G. Barns is Gregory Barnes and that a summons shall issue for Gregory Barnes and that the Clerk of Court shall cause the U.S. Marshal Service to serve the amended summons and complaint on defendant Gregory Barnes without plaintiff's payment; the defendant is directed to answer the complaint. Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on 2/25/09. (SG)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER requesting the Attorney General's Office to produce the identity of defendant G. Barns and ascertain a proper address for him by 3/1/09; Once the information is provided, amended summonses shall be issued and the Court shall direct service on the defendant; the Clerk of Court shall send a copy of this Order and the complaint to the Assistant Attorney General, Delia Cadle, who is currently representing the other defendants. Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on 1/26/09. (SG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
