Gaymar Industries, Inc. v. Cincinnati Sub-Zero Products, Inc. et al
| Gaymar Industries, Inc. |
| Cincinnati Sub-Zero Products, Inc. and Innercool therapies, Inc. |
| 1:2008cv00299 |
| April 18, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Buffalo Office |
| Erie |
| William M. Skretny |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
136
DECISION AND ORDER as to 121 Motion to Compel. Signed by Hon. Jeremiah J. McCarthy on 3/20/12. (DAZ)
|
|
Filing
119
DECISION AND ORDER DIRECTING the Clerk of the Court to re-open this case; GRANTING CSZ's 96 Motion Addressing Reinstatement, Amendment, Determination of Prevailing Party, and Targeted Discovery; DIRECTING CSZ to file its Second Amended Answer by January 30, 2012; DENYING Gaymar's 101 Motion to Dismiss; DENYING CSZ's 114 Motion to Join Stryker; DENYING without prejudice CSZ's 110 Motion to Compel; DIRECTING CSZ to file a Motion to Compel, if necessary, by February 6, 2 012; DIRECTING Gaymar to file its Answer and, if necessary, a memorandum in opposition to CSZ's Motion to Compel by February 20, 2012; ADVISING CSZ and Gaymar that they have until April 20, 2012 to conduct their discovery, which may include depo sitions of any declarant, Dr. Stewart, and Hermann Pohl; DIRECTING CSZ to file its fee motion by May 18, 2012; DIRECTING Gaymar to file its opposition to the fee motion by June 15, 2012; DIRECTING CSZ to file its reply by June 29, 2012. Signed by William M. Skretny, Chief Judge U.S.D.C. on 1/19/2012. (MEAL)
|
|
Filing
91
DECISION AND ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; GRANTING Defendant's 21 Motion to Stay; DENYING as moot, subject to reinstatement Plaintiff's 29 Motion to Strike Defendant's Answer and Counterclai m; GRANTING Plaintiff's 53 Motion for Leave to File a Supplemental Memorandum and Declaration; DENYING as moot Plaintiff's 70 Motion to Strike and/or Preclude the Killworth Declaration and Testimony; DENYING as moot, subject to reinstat ement Defendant's 72 Motion for Leave to File an Amended Answer; GRANTING in part and DENYING as moot in part Plaintiff's 89 Motion for for Leave to File Supplemental Authority; DIRECTING counsel to file motion within 14 days of the PTO's reexamination decision requesting the scheduling of a status conference; DIRECTING the Clerk of the Court to place this case on this Court's administrative calendar. Signed by William M. Skretny U.S.D.J. on 9/28/2009. (MEAL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
