Goossens v. Dept. of Environmental Concevation et al
1:2008cv00446 |
June 17, 2008 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
Leslie G. Foschio |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 41 DECISION and ORDER denying 21 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 26 Motion for Summary Judgment. Clerk directed to close the case. Signed by Hon. Leslie G. Foschio on 3/28/2011. (SDW) |
Filing 35 DECISION and ORDER denying 12 Motion for Default Judgment; denying 13 Motion to Strike. Signed by Hon. Leslie G. Foschio on 6/29/2010. (SDW) |
Filing 7 ORDER denying plaintiff's request to add defendant Sheenan. The Clerk of Court is directed to file plaintiff's papers and to cause the U.S. Marshal to serve copies of the summons, amended complaint, and this Order upon the named defendants without plaintiff's payment therefor, unpaid fees to be recoverable if this action terminates by monetary award in plaintiff's favor. Defendants are directed to answer the complaint. Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on 2/25/09. (DZ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Goossens v. Dept. of Environmental Concevation et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.