Walker v. Mattingly et al
Lamont Walker |
Susanna Mattingly, Lisa A. Hoy, James L. Gibbons and Thomas P. Grant |
1:2009cv00845 |
September 28, 2009 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Buffalo Office |
Niagara |
H. Kenneth Schroeder |
H. Kenneth Schroeder |
Plaintiff |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 67 DECISION AND ORDER denying Plaintiff's 46 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Lamont Walker and granting 49 Defendant's Cross-MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by James L. Gibbons, Thomas P. Grant, Susanna Mattingly, Lisa A. Hoy. The complaint is dismissed in its entirety. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendant. Leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals as a poor person is denied. Signed by Hon. John T. Curtin on 4/4/2012. (JEC) |
Filing 19 DECISION AND ORDER denying 17 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying 17 Motion to Amend or Correct. Signed by Hon. H. Kenneth Schroeder, Jr. on January 25, 2010.(APG) |
Filing 18 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 9 denying plaintiff's request for a temporary restraining order. Case is referred back to Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 1/20/2010. (JMB) |
Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re Request for Temporary Restraining Order [3, 4, and 7] filed by Lamont Walker. Objections due fourteen days from receipt. Signed by Hon. H. Kenneth Schroeder, Jr. on December 21, 2009. (APG) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.