Brown v. Department of Correctional Services of New York State et al
| Geneo Brown |
| Department of Correctional Services of New York State, NYS Office of Mental Health, Brian Fischer, Lucien J. LeClaire, David Napoli, Marshal Trabout, Marilyn Bridge, Joseph Haluska, J. Antonsen, Henderson, David Chapman, Gilboy, Deburgomaster and Escrow |
| 1:2009cv00949 |
| November 4, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Buffalo Office |
| Ulster |
| William M. Skretny |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
146
DECISION AND ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 114 Motion for Summary Judgment; GRANTING in part and DENYING in part Defendants' 119 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment; DISMISSING the Amended Complaint with respect to all Defendants except Daniel Chapman, Mark DeBurgomaster, and Timothy Gilboy. Signed by William M. Skretny, Chief Judge on 3/2/2013. (CLERK TO FOLLOW UP.) (MEAL)
|
|
Filing
69
DECISION and ORDER granting in part and denying in part 33 Motion to Amend or Correct; granting in part and denying in part and decision reserved in part 50 Motion to Compel. Signed by Hon. Leslie G. Foschio on 6/2/2011. (SDW)
|
|
Filing
18
DECISION AND ORDER. Time extended for Plaintiff to serve summons and complaint upon defendants referred to in order. Signed by Hon. Leslie G. Foschio on 8/25/2010. (SDW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
