Lilly v. Lewiston-Porter Central School District et al
Edward Lilly |
Lewiston-Porter Central School District, David Schaubert, Louis Palmeri, Robert Laub and James Mezhir |
1:2010cv00548 |
June 30, 2010 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Buffalo Office |
Niagara |
William M. Skretny |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 64 DECISION AND ORDER SETTING aside the 58 Report and Recommendation to the extent it premises dismissal on the ground that failing to register for the training is necessarily "official misconduct." GRANTING Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; DIRECTING the Clerk of Court to close this case. Signed by William M. Skretny, Chief Judge on 3/31/2014. (MEAL) - CLERK TO FOLLOW UP - |
Filing 33 DECISION AND ORDER ADOPTING in Part and SETTING Aside in Part the 19 Report and Recommendation; GRANTING in Part and DENYING in Part Defendant School District's 11 Motion to Dismiss; GRANTING in Part and DENYING in Part Defendant Schaubert 039;s 14 Motion to Dismiss; GRANTING Defendant Palmeri, Laub, and Mezhir's 14 Motion to Dismiss; DISMISSING Defendants Palmeri, Laub and Mezhir from this case; DIRECTING the remaining parties to report to Magistrate Judge Foschio for further proceedings in this case. Signed by William M. Skretny, Chief Judge U.S.D.C. on 12/20/2011. (MEAL) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.