Daniels v. Kloch et al
| John Daniels |
| Richard C. Kloch, Sr., Elizabeth R. Donatello, David J. Farrugia, Robert Viola, William L Ross, Wendy J. Roberson, The County of Niagara, Elizabeth M. Devane, Dawne E. Amsler, Brian Fischer, Andrea D. Evans, Ralph, Bratek, Mark Smith, W. Mottl and Jane Doe |
| 1:2010cv00884 |
| November 4, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Buffalo Office |
| Erie |
| William M. Skretny |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE HUGH B. SCOTTORDER granting 17 Motion for Judgment on the PleadingsDefendants' motion to dismiss (Docket No. 17) is dismissed. Court Clerk is directed to close this case.This Court certifies that an appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.So Ordered. Signed by Hon. Hugh B. Scott on 6/11/2012. (DRH)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE HUGH B. SCOTTORDER denying 8 Motion for copies of documents; granting 10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or to Move, Oth erwise Plead to Plaintiff's ComplaintPlaintiff's motion for copies of documents without charge (Docket No. 8) is denied. Defendants' motion (Docket No. 10) is granted, nunc pro tunc; W. Mottl answer due 10/6/2011. So Ordered. Signed by Hon. Hugh B. Scott on 11/2/2011. (DRH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
