Amaker v. Bradt et al
Plaintiff: Anthony D. Amaker
Defendant: Mark L. Bradt, Brian S. Fischer, Lucien J. LeClaire, Jr., Paul Chappius, Earhart and Cartwright
Case Number: 1:2010cv00977
Filed: December 2, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Office: Buffalo Office
County: Wyoming
Presiding Judge: Richard J. Arcara
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 94 DECISION AND ORDER granting plaintiff's 82 Motion for Reconsideration, the claim is reinstated and the case is referred back to Judge Schroeder for discovery and any further proceedings, pursuant to the referral order of April 26, 2011, Docke t Item 11. This decision is without prejudice to the defendants' bringing another motion before Judge Schroeder to dismiss the plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim or for summary judgment on that or any other remaining claim. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Lawrence J. Vilardo on 6/1/2018. (Chambers mailed a copy of this Decision and Order to pro se plaintiff, Anthony Amaker). (CMD)
April 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 80 ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge H. Kenneth Schroeder, Jr.'s Report and Recommendation 60 as filed on August 27, 2014. Defendants' motion to dismiss 22 is granted in part and denied in part. The matter is referred back to Magistrate Jud ge Schroeder for further proceedings. SO ORDERED. A copy of this Order has been mailed to Anthony Amaker, OTISVILLE FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Inmate Mail/Parcels, P.O. BOX 1000, OTISVILLE, NY 10963. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 4/20/15. (LAS)
September 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER: Adopting Magistrate Judge H. Kenneth Schroeder, Jr.'s Report and Recommendation 60 as filed on August 27, 2014. To the extent outlined in the attached Decision and Order, the defendant's motion to dismiss 32 is granted in part. The case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 9/24/14. (LAS)
January 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER denying 36 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 36 Motion for TRO; adopting Report and Recommendation 57 .. Case is referred back to Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 1/8/2014. (JMB)
May 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER denying 26 Motion for TRO; denying 26 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 35 Motion for TRO; denying 35 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; adopting Report and Recommendation re 44 . Case is referred back to Magistrate Judge Schroeder for further proceedings. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 5/9/2013. (JMB)
September 30, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER directing service of the Summons and Amended Complaint upon additional defendants. Signed by Hon. H. Kenneth Schroeder, Jr on 9/30/2011. (KER)
February 17, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER, directing the Clerk to add as defendants Klodzinski, Padlo and John Does, the U.S. Marshal Service shall serve the summons and complaint upon Klodzinski and Padlo in addition to the defendants originally named in the caption and directed to be served; plaintiff is directed to identify defendants John Doe through discovery as soon as possible, and then apply for an order directing amendment of the caption and service on the defendants as soon as they have been identified. Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on 2/16/11. (SG)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Amaker v. Bradt et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anthony D. Amaker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark L. Bradt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brian S. Fischer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lucien J. LeClaire, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Paul Chappius
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Earhart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cartwright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?