Santiago v. Cully et al
| Emmanuel Santiago |
| T. Walsh, Brown, Barker, Lucas and Cully |
| 1:2011cv00204 |
| March 10, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Buffalo Office |
| Erie |
| Hugh B. Scott |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE HUGH B. SCOTTORDER granting 33 Motion to Dismiss; granting 33 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of ProsecutionCourt Clerk is instructed to close this case. It is certified that an appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and leave to appeal as a poor person is denied; application to appeal as a poor person must be directed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on motion pursuant to Rule 24 of Fed. R. App. P.So Ordered. Signed by Hon. Hugh B. Scott on 5/14/2012. (DRH)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying without prejudice as premature 3 Motion to Appoint Counsel. The Clerk of Court is directed to file plaintiff's papers and to cause the U.S. Marshal to serve copies of t he summons, complaint, and this Order upon the named defendants without plaintiff's payment therefor, unpaid fees to be recoverable if this action terminates by monetary award in plaintiff's favor. Defendants are directed to answer the complaint. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 4/6/11. (DZ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
