Allah v. Graham
Petitioner: Kemet Allah
Respondent: Harold D. Graham
Case Number: 1:2011cv00425
Filed: May 18, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Office: Buffalo Office
County: Cayuga
Presiding Judge: Hugh B. Scott
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 12 AMENDED DECISION AND ORDER - Amended Decision and Order (Dkt.10) dismissing the petition. Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on 1/4/13. (JMC)
May 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 10 DECISION AND ORDER dismissing the petition (Dkt. 1) as untimely. (Clerk to close case.) Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on 5/10/12. (JMC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Allah v. Graham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Kemet Allah
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Harold D. Graham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?