Mills v. Lempke et al
Petitioner: Richard Mills
Respondent: John B. Lempke and Eric Schneiderman
Case Number: 1:2011cv00440
Filed: May 20, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Office: Buffalo Office
County: Seneca
Presiding Judge: Richard J. Arcara
Presiding Judge: H. Kenneth Schroeder
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 102 DECISION AND ORDER denying 94 Motion Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15 & 60. Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on 6/4/2019. (AFB)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Decision and Order to the petitioner Richard Mills.
May 7, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 75 ORDER denying 70 Motion. Copy of Order sent by first class mail to Petitioner.. Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on 5/5/17. (JMC)
October 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 65 -CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-DECISION and ORDER denying with prejudice 56 Petitioner's Motion to Vacate ; denying with prejudice 57 Petitioner's Motion for Sanctions; denying with prejudice 64 Petitioner's Motion for Issuance of Subpoe nas. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on 10/11/16. The Clerk of the Court is requested to mail a copy of this Decision and Order to the pro se petitioner. (AFB)
September 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 50 -CLERK TO FOLLOW UP- DECISION AND ORDER denying 45 Motion to Vacate with prejudice ; denying 45 Motion for Recusal with prejudice consistent with this Decision and Order. Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on 9/29/14. (JMC)
May 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER: Petitioners motions to join claims, parties and to consolidate (Dkt ##6 & 10) are denied with prejudice. Petitioners motion for permission to conduct discovery (Dkt #8) is denied with prejudice. Respondent is ordered to answer the first amende d petition (Dkt #7) and to respond to Petitioner's motion for a stay and abeyance (Dkt #3), as explained in the Order. Petitioner may file responses to Respondent's pleadings, as explained in the Order. The Clerk of the Court is directed to amend the caption and effect service on various parties, as described in the Order. CLERK TO FOLLOW UP. Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on 5/3/12. (JMC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mills v. Lempke et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Richard Mills
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: John B. Lempke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Eric Schneiderman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?