Fried v. The Bank of Castile
Plaintiff: Avrohom P. Fried
Defendant: The Bank of Castile
Case Number: 1:2012cv00624
Filed: July 3, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Office: Buffalo Office
County: Kings
Presiding Judge: William M. Skretny
Nature of Suit: Banks and Banking
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 21 PRELIMINARY APPROVAL ORDER. Final Approval Hearing set for 6/5/2013 at 9:00 AM before William M. Skretny, Chief Judge. FURTHER, GRANTING Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement as specified. Signed by William M. Skretny, Chief Judge U.S.D.C. on 1/31/2013. (CMD)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fried v. The Bank of Castile
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Bank of Castile
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Avrohom P. Fried
Represented By: Shimshon Wexler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?