Donahue v. Griffin
Petitioner: Dennis Donahue
Respondent: Patrick Griffin
Case Number: 1:2012cv00752
Filed: August 9, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Office: Buffalo Office
County: Sullivan
Presiding Judge: William M. Skretny
Presiding Judge: H. Kenneth Schroeder
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 16 -CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-DECISION AND ORDER denying petitioner's writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Clerk of Court is requested to close this case. Signed by Hon. Michael J. Roemer on 9/27/2016. (RAZ) Copy of Decision and Order mailed to petitioner at Sullivan Correctional Facility.
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Donahue v. Griffin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Dennis Donahue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Patrick Griffin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?