Jones v. Takhar Group Collection Services, LTD. et al
| Mitch Jones |
| Takhar Group Collection Services, LTD. and DOE 1-5 |
| 1:2012cv01194 |
| December 3, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Buffalo Office |
| Albany |
| John T. Curtin |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
---CLERK TO FOLLOW UP---DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's 39 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Hardial S. Takhar and Sukcharn S. Takhar. Plaintiff is awarded $500.00 for Defendants' violation of the FDCPA, $2,887.33 in attorney's fees, and $363.61 in costs. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and to close this case. Signed by Hon. John T. Curtin on 3/24/2016. (JEC)
|
|
Filing
36
-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP--DECISION AND ORDER denying Defendants' 31 Motion to vacate the Clerk's Entry of Default. Signed by Hon. John T. Curtin on 6/25/2014. (JEC)
|
|
Filing
24
-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP----DECISION AND ORDER granting Defendants' Motion 17 MOTION to Vacate 15 Clerk's Entry of Default. The court has been informed that plaintiff and defendants Financial Debt and FDR have reached a settlement. The parties are forthwith directed to file a stipulation of dismissal in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Hon. John T. Curtin on 1/15/2014. (JEC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
