Mitchell v. Braselmann et al
Michael Mitchell |
Peter Braselmann, John Doe and Jane Doe |
1:2013cv00150 |
February 11, 2013 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Buffalo Office |
Chemung |
William M. Skretny |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 42 DECISION AND ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 30 Motion for Summary Judgment; DENYING Defendants' 37 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment; DISMISSING the Complaint; DIRECTING the Clerk of the Court to close this case. Signed by William M. Skretny, Chief Judge on 1/31/2015. (MEAL) - CLERK TO FOLLOW UP - |
Filing 9 ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 7 Motion to Compel without prejudice; the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to amend the caption to add Candice Rae Bauer and Joanne Seeley as defendants in place of two Jane Does, Medical Nurses and shall cause the US Marshal Service to serve the Summons and Complaint with this Order and the 3 Order filed 2/22/2013 upon Nurse Candice Rae Bauer and Nurse Joanne Seeley, as specified; the New York State Attorney General's Office shall, upon receipt, forward p laintiff copies of his medical records for the period of time at issue in the complaint and plaintiff shall review said records to determine if any other nurses shall be named as defendants and if so, file and serve a motion to amend the caption to name those Nurses. Signed by Hon. John T. Curtin on 5/15/2013. (CMD) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.