Maecker v. EverHome Mortgage Company
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|November 24, 2014
ORDER: Upon reconsideration pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(1) of the Courts entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant Everhome Mortgage Company, and for the reasons stated above and in the Magistrate Judge Hugh B. Scotts Rep ort and Recommendation, Dkt. No. 19, as modified, the Clerk is directed to: (1) vacate the Courts prior Orders, Dkt. Nos. 25, 26; (2) vacate the Judgment entered March 27, 2014, Dkt. No. 27; but (3) upon the Courts renewed grant of summary judgment i n favor of defendant Everhome for the reasons stated above and in the Report and Recommendation, and denying injunctive relief as moot, (4) enter judgment in favor of defendant Everhome on this Decision and Order. SO ORDERED -CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 11/24/14. (LAS)
|August 1, 2014
ORDER: For the reasons stated in the attached Order, the Court finds that it lacks the necessary jurisdiction to rule on Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration 31 and 32 . However, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62.1(a)(3), the Court indicates that if the Court of Appeals were to remand the issue pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 12.1, the Court would grant the motion for reconsideration for the limited purpose of reconsidering the Report and Recommendation i n light of Plaintiff's untimely objections and exhibits. Plaintiff is advised that he is obligated to provide notice of this Court's indicative ruling to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. A copy of the Order and this docket entry have been mailed to William Maecker, 133 Central Avenue, Silver Creek, NY 14136. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 7/31/14. (LAS)
|March 26, 2014
-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP- ORDER granting 8 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 3/27/14. (LAS)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?