Wagner v. Colvin

Plaintiff: Ralph Edward Wagner
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 1:2013cv00346
Filed: April 8, 2013
Court: New York Western District Court
Office: Buffalo Office
County: Albany
Presiding Judge: Richard J. Arcara
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42:205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 20, 2016 21 Opinion or Order of the Court -CLERK TO FOLLOW UP- DECISION AND ORDER denying 16 Government's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; granting 18 Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings to the extent that this matter is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this order and with the R&R; adopting Report and Recommendations re 20 Report and Recommendations. (Clerk to close case.) Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on 4/20/16. (JMC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wagner v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ralph Edward Wagner
Represented By: Jaya Ann Shurtliff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?