Hojnowski v. Buffalo Bills, Inc.

Plaintiff: David Hojnowski
Defendant: Buffalo Bills, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2013cv00388
Filed: April 18, 2013
Court: New York Western District Court
Office: Buffalo Office
County: Niagara
Presiding Judge: William M. Skretny
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 3, 2014 19 Opinion or Order of the Court DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING Defendant's 6 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss the Complaint; DIRECTING the parties to proceed to arbitration in accordance with the terms of the agreement; DIRECTING the Clerk of Court to close this case. Signed by William M. Skretny, Chief Judge on 2/3/2014. - CLERK TO FOLLOW UP - (MEAL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hojnowski v. Buffalo Bills, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Hojnowski
Represented By: Andrew P. Fleming
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Buffalo Bills, Inc.
Represented By: Scott Patrick Horton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.