Washington v. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. et al
| Jermaine Washington |
| Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. and Roslyn Rindemann |
| 1:2013cv00617 |
| June 13, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Buffalo Office |
| Erie |
| William M. Skretny |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP- DECISION AND ORDER granting 67 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and dismissing the Plaintiff's complaint in its entirety with prejudice. (Clerk to close case.) Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on 11/22/16. Copy of Decision and Order sent by first class mail to Plaintiff. (JMC)
|
|
Filing
38
DECISION AND ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 33 Motion to Opt Out of ADR. FURTHER, the deadlines within the 30 Scheduling Order shall remain in effect, with the exception that the deadline by which to select a mediator is extended to October 1, 2014. Signed by William M. Skretny, Chief Judge U.S.D.C. on 9/23/2014. (CMD)
|
|
Filing
13
DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING in part and DENYING in part Defendants' 6 Motion to Dismiss; DENYING as moot Plaintiff's 9 Motion to Amend; DIRECTING the Clerk of the Court to terminate Roslyn Rindemann as a Defendant. Signed by William M. Skretny, Chief Judge on 6/22/2014. (MEAL) - CLERK TO FOLLOW UP -
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
