Gallagher v. Derkovicz et al
| Joseph Irving Gallagher |
| Gregory J. Derkovicz, James Walsh and Wendy L. Walsh |
| 1:2013cv00804 |
| August 6, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Buffalo Office |
| Onondaga |
| Richard J. Arcara |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
ORDER ADOPTING 67 Report and Recommendation and 69 Amended Report, Recommendation, and Order. The defendants' 63 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; the 1 Complaint is dismissed and the Clerk of the Court is instructed to close this case. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Lawrence J. Vilardo on 4/24/2017. (Copy of Order mailed to pro se plaintiff Joseph Gallagher at Central New York Psychiatric Center). (CMD)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-
|
|
Filing
65
DECISION AND ORDER denying plaintiff's 64 motion for appointment of counsel without prejudice. Plaintiff shall respond to defendants' 63 motion for summary judgment on or before 12/2/2016 and defendants shall file a reply on or before 12/16/2016. Oral argument will be scheduled, if deemed necessary, at the discretion of the Court. Signed by Hon. Michael J. Roemer on 10/17/2016. (RAZ) Copy of Decision and Order and docket sheet mailed to pro se plaintiff at Central New York Psychiatric Center.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
