Roth v. 2810026 Canada Limited Ltd et al
| Jeffrey Roth |
| 2810026 Canada Limited Ltd., 2810034 Canada Limited, Frederick Group Inc., Singh Amarjit and Pamela J. Bauman |
| 2810026 Canada Limited Ltd., Frederick Group Inc. and 2810034 Canada Limited |
| Pamela J. Bauman |
| 1:2013cv00901 |
| September 4, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Buffalo Office |
| Erie |
| Richard J. Arcara |
| Leslie G. Foschio |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
97
DECISION AND ORDER: The Court ADOPTS IN PART and MODIFIES IN PART Judge Foschio's R&Rs (ECF No. 86 in 13-CV-901 and ECF No. 71 in 15-CV-374). Corporate Defendants' motions for summary judgment (ECF No. 87 in 13-CV-901 and ECF No. 56 in 15-C V-374) are GRANTED; Roth's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 71 in 13-CV-901) is DENIED; Bauman's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 70 in 13-CV-901) is DENIED; the Corporate Defendants' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 49 in 15-CV-374) is DENIED AS MOOT; the claims against Defendant Singh are dismissed pursuant to Rule 56(f)(1); and the cross-claims brought by Defendants are dismissed as moot. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in both actions and close the cases. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 2/14/2020. (MFM)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-
|
|
Filing
86
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS / DECISION AND ORDER re 71 MOTION for Summary Judgment for Negligence & Serious Injury filed by Jeffrey Roth, 70 First MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Pamela Bauman. Objections due fourteen days from receipt. Signed by Hon. Leslie G. Foschio on 9/28/2017. (SDW)
|
|
Filing
69
DECISION AND ORDER. Plaintiffs' motion (Dkt. 58) is DISMISSED as moot in part and DENIED in part; and Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff's motion (Dkt. 59) is deemed WITHDRAWN and, as such, is DISMISSED as moot. Signed by Hon. Leslie G. Foschio on 1/18/2017. (SDW)
|
|
Filing
53
DECISION AND ORDER. Pursuant to Rule 37(a)(5)(A) and Rule 37(d)(3), Defendants' counsel shall pay Plaintiffs' reasonable expenses, including attorneys fees, incurred in connection with Plaintiffs' motion. Plaintiffs shall submit Plain tiffs' attorney's affidavit detailing such expenses, based on contemporaneous time-records and Plaintiffs' attorney's billing rates, within 30 days of this Decision and Order; Defendants' opposition, if any, shall be filed within 15 days thereafter; Plaintiffs' reply, if any, shall be filed within 5 days thereafter. Oral argument shall be at the court's discretion. Signed by Hon. Leslie G. Foschio on 10/4/2016. (SDW)
|
|
Filing
51
DECISION AND ORDER. Plaintiffs' motion, Dkt. 46, is GRANTED; Defendants' depositions shall be conducted within 45 days of this Decision and Order; Defendants' Request, Dkt.47, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; Defendants' mo tion, Dkt. 26, is DISMISSED as moot. A Second Amended Scheduling Order extending the respective dates by 90 days will be entered contemporaneous with this Decision and Order. Oral argument on Plaintiffs' motion for July 20, 2016 is hereby CANC ELLED. Defendants shall show cause why Plaintiffs' expenses, including reasonable attorneys fees, incurred in connection with Plaintiffs motion should not be granted pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(a)(5)(A) not later than July 29, 2016; Plaintiffs' response shall be filed not later than August 8, 2016. Oral argument shall be at the discretion of the court. Signed by Hon. Leslie G. Foschio on 7/18/2016. (SDW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
