Williams v. Swack et al
George Williams |
Keith Swack, Sean Warner, Matthew Raddemacher and Eric Hibsch |
1:2013cv00974 |
September 26, 2013 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Buffalo Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Jeremiah J. McCarthy |
William M. Skretny |
Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 119 DECISION AND ORDER: the remaining portions of plaintiff's motion to compel 80 are denied with the exception of plaintiff's request for an award of attorney's fees. I will defer consideration of the amount of attorney's fees to be awarded pending an application by plaintiff at the conclusion of the case. Signed by Hon. Jeremiah J. McCarthy on 9/6/2016. (JDK) |
Filing 100 DECISION AND ORDER Re Plaintiff's Motion to Compel 30 . Signed by Hon. Jeremiah J. McCarthy on 6/29/16. (DAZ) |
Filing 62 DECISION AND ORDER denying 57 Motion to Continue; denying 58 Motion for Joinder; denying 59 Motion to Continue. Signed by Hon. Jeremiah J. McCarthy on 5/12/15. (DAZ) |
Filing 38 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Azrack's R&R as the opinion of the Court. Defendants' motion to transfer venue is granted, and the Clerk of Court is directed to transfer this action to the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York. Ordered by Chief Judge Carol Bagley Amon on 9/24/2013. [Transferred from nyed on 9/26/2013.] |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.