Spring et al v. Allegany-Limestone Central School District et al
| Keri Spring, Eugene Spring, Julianne Spring and Eugene Spring and Keri Spring |
| Allegany-Limestone Central School District, The Board of Education of the Allegany-Limestone Central School District, Karen Geelan, Joe Zimmer, Phil Quinlan, Matthew Kahm, Jeff Black, David Farrell, Jay King, Kim Palmer, Sue Schifley, Maggie Nuss, Kevin Straub, Diane Lowry, Eric Hemphill, Christopher Kenyon, John Wolfgang, Robert Decker, John Doe(s), Jane Doe(s), Michael Easton and Jacob Rowe |
| 1:2014cv00476 |
| June 17, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Buffalo Office |
| Allegany |
| William M. Skretny |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
306
ORDER denying 295 Motion for Judgment NOV. Signed by Hon. John L. Sinatra, Jr. on 2/1/24. (SG)
|
|
Filing
300
ORDER that the School District Defendant's motion for expedited hearing is granted; that the bond submitted by the School District Defendants is approved; that the School District Defendants' motion to stay execution on the Judgment pending resolution of post-trial motions and the pending appeal is granted; and that the School District Defendants' motion for TRO is rendered moot. Signed by Hon. John L. Sinatra, Jr. on 11/16/2023. (KLH)
|
|
Filing
230
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 203 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 206 Motion in Limine. Signed by Hon. John L. Sinatra, Jr. on 7/20/23. (SG)
|
|
Filing
170
DECISION AND ORDER IT HEREBY IS ORDERED, that Defendant Lowry's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Nos. 142, 144) is GRANTED.FURTHER, that the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to terminate Defendant Lowry from this case.FURT HER, that Plaintiffs' motion for an enlargement of time to identify Diane Lowry's legal representative or successor (Docket No. 168) is DENIED AS MOOT. SO ORDERED.Signed by William M. Skretny, United States District Judge on 5/17/2022. (JCM)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-
|
|
Filing
165
DECISION AND ORDER -- IT HEREBY IS ORDERED, that Plaintiffs' Motion to Seal (Docket No. 159) Exhibits A, B, and C to the Affirmation of Keri Spring is GRANTED. FURTHER, that the Clerk of Court is directed to file Exhibits A, B, and C to the Affirmation of Keri Spring (Docket Nos. 158-5, 158-6, and 158-7) under seal. SO ORDERED. Signed by William M. Skretny, United States District Judge on 9/14/2021. (JCM)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-
|
|
Filing
96
DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING in part and DENYING in part the Defendant Lowry's 85 Motion to Dismiss and the School Defendants 83 Motion to Dismiss; DENYING Defendant Roewe's 82 Motion to Dismiss; DENYING Defendant Easton's 87 Mo tion to Dismiss; GRANTING in part Plaintiffs' 92 Motion to Amend; DIRECTING Plaintiffs to file their proposed Third Amended Complaint omitting the dismissed claims and parties, consistent with this Decision and Order no later than February 15, 2018. Signed by William M. Skretny, United States District Judge on 12/19/2017. (MEAL)- CLERK TO FOLLOW UP -
|
|
Filing
70
DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING in part and DISMISSING as moot in part Defendant Lowry's 40 Motion to Dismiss and the School Defendants' 42 Motion to Dismiss; DISMISSING as moot Defendants Roewe and Easton's 60 [62) Motions to Dismiss; DIRECTING the Clerk of the Court to close this case. Signed by William M. Skretny, United State District Judge on 9/30/2015. (MEAL) - CLERK TO FOLLOW UP -
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
