DIRECTV, LLC v. Wright et al
Plaintiff: DIRECTV, LLC
Defendant: Paul Wright and Theresa Wright
Case Number: 1:2015cv00474
Filed: May 29, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Office: Buffalo Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Frank P. Geraci
Nature of Suit: Cable/Satellite TV
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 57 DECISION AND ORDER: For the reasons stated herein, Plaintiff's 55 application for attorneys' fees and costs is GRANTED IN PART. SO ORDERED. A copy of this Decision and Order has been mailed to the pro se defendants. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 1/21/2020. (GMS)
December 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 54 DECISION AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the Decision and Order, Paul Wright's request for vacatur of the clerk's default against him is DENIED, but Theresa Wright's request for vacatur of the clerk's default against her i s GRANTED. Further, DIRECTV's renewed request for a default judgment is GRANTED as to Paul Wright but DENIED as to Theresa Wright. Accordingly, within 30 days from the date of this order, DIRECTV shall submit: -an application for attorneys&# 039; fees and costs with supporting documentation and analysis that sufficiently sets forth, for each attorney, the date, the hours expended, and the nature of the work done, as well as the reasonableness of the fee in light of the attorney's ex perience and skill and the prevailing fees in this district. See, e.g., Wells Fargo Bank v. LLHC Realty, LLC, No. 6:15-cv-06680-FPG-MWP, ECF Nos. 94, 99; -a proposed default judgment against Paul Wright incorporating the requested attorneys' fees award and DIRECTV's proposed injunction, which must comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d); and -notice as to whether DIRECTV intends to pursue its claims against Theresa Wright or dismiss her, and as to whether it intends to dismiss its fifth and sixth claims. SO ORDERED. Copies of the Decision and Order and this NEF have been mailed to the pro se defendants. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 12/16/19. (GMS)
December 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 50 DECISION AND ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: For the reasons stated, Defendants' 47 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED and Defendants are hereby ORDERED to show cause in writing by January 25, 2019, why the Court should not enter default judgment against them. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 12/21/18. A copy of the decision and order and order to show cause and notice of electronic filing have been mailed to the pro se Defendants. (JO)
September 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 46 DECISION AND ORDER: For the reasons stated, Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment, ECF No. 40 , is DENIED. Defendants are hereby ordered to answer the Complaint by October 26, 2018. Defendants are warned that a failure to answer the Complai nt or any future failure to follow a Court Order or deadline may result in sanctions or judgment being entered against Defendants for an amount of damages determined by the Court. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 9/19/18. A copy of this Decision and Order has been mailed to the pro se Defendants. (JO)
October 5, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 39 DECISION AND ORDER: Defendant Theresa Wright's Motion for an Extension of Time to Find an Attorney 34 is DENIED. SO ORDERED. A Copy of this NEF and Decision and Order have been mailed to the pro se Defendants. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 10/5/2017. (AFM)
June 29, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 32 DECISION AND ORDER: Paul Wright's motions to dismiss 30 25 are both DENIED. Paul Wright is directed to file an answer to the complaint on or before July 31, 2017. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 06/29/2017. A copy of this decision and order (along with NEF) has been sent via US Mail to Paul Wright at his address of record. (ZS)
June 3, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER. Theresa Wright's motion to dismiss 12 is DENIED. Paul Wright's motion to dismiss 13 is DENIED in part. The Court requests further briefing on the 18 U.S.C. § 2511 claim and the tort claims in accordance with the discussion in Part II.D and Part II.F. DirecTV's brief is due within 30 days of the date of this Order, and Paul Wright may submit a response within 30 days of the day in which DirecTV submits its brief. The supplemental briefs shall not exceed 25 pages. For now, the Court reserves judgment on whether to dismiss the § 2511 claim and the tort claims. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 6/3/16. (BD)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DIRECTV, LLC v. Wright et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DIRECTV, LLC
Represented By: James H. Forte
Represented By: Jakob Benjamin Halpern
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Paul Wright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Theresa Wright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?