Linza v. Colvin

Linza v. Colvin

Plaintiff:	Stephen Linza
Defendant:	Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number:	1:2015cv00567
Filed:	June 25, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of New York
Office:	Buffalo Office
County:	Niagara
Presiding Judge:	Richard J. Arcara
Nature of Suit:	Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 1, 2019	Filing 30 DECISION AND ORDER granting 24 Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; denying 25 Commissioner's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. The case is remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with this Decision and Order. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on 7/1/2019. (JMC)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-
November 23, 2016	Filing 22 DECISION AND ORDER: The Commissioner's motion to dismiss 12 is denied, and the plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to serve the summons and complaint 6 is granted. The Court deems service under Rule 4(i) effective nunc pro t unc. The Commissioner shall file the certified transcript of administrative proceedings within 90 days of the date of this Decision and Order. Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings is to be filed within 30 days of the filing of the administrative transcript, and the Commissioner shall respond within 30 days. Plaintiff will then have 14 days to reply. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 11/23/16. (LAS)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 1, 2019

Filing 30 DECISION AND ORDER granting 24 Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; denying 25 Commissioner's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. The case is remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with this Decision and Order. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on 7/1/2019. (JMC)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-

November 23, 2016

Filing 22 DECISION AND ORDER: The Commissioner's motion to dismiss 12 is denied, and the plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to serve the summons and complaint 6 is granted. The Court deems service under Rule 4(i) effective nunc pro t unc. The Commissioner shall file the certified transcript of administrative proceedings within 90 days of the date of this Decision and Order. Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings is to be filed within 30 days of the filing of the administrative transcript, and the Commissioner shall respond within 30 days. Plaintiff will then have 14 days to reply. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Richard J. Arcara on 11/23/16. (LAS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Linza v. Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephen Linza
Represented By:	Andrew O. Miller
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?